The need for National System Employers to review their performance management practises and ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009 has once again come to the fore due to a recent unfair dismissal case before Fair Work Australia.
In Ward v Arcadian Nominees t/as Instant Waste Management [2009] FWA 609, an ex-employee of Instant Waste Management succeeded in his claim that he had been unfairly dismissed by his employer. It was found that the employer had neither a valid reason for terminating the employee’s employment, nor was the employee afforded a fair process.
The employee, who was employed as a sales representative, gave evidence to the effect that his employer terminated him for not meeting sales targets in June 2009. He claimed that on his engagement with the company, no set weekly sales quotas had been stipulated. However, three months into his employment, the company verbally advised him and others of increased sales targets to be achieved.
The employee was terminated by the general manager, who advised that the basis of the dismissal was due to his failure to reach the communicated set sales targets. The employee claimed he had neither been advised of the deficiencies in his performance, nor was he aware of the consequences of his failure to meet those set targets. Despite other employees failing to meet sales quotas, he was the only one to have been terminated on that basis.
In responding to the employee’s claims, the employer put forward that the employee should have been aware of the sales quota by way of monthly management meetings where sales performance was discussed. However, the employer failed to provide witness statements to support his response.
On the basis of the evidence available, Fair Work Australia determined the employee had been unfairly dismissed due to their being no valid reason for the termination. In addition, the unfairness of the dismissal manifested itself in the employer’s failure to provide prior warning of the deficiencies in performance and to communicate the consequences of continued poor performance to the employee.
Whilst the employer did notify the employee of the reason for the termination and allowed the employee an opportunity to respond, this was not sufficient to satisfy Fair Work Australia that the dismissal was not unreasonable. Fair Work Australia did take into account the fact that the business does not have a dedicated human resources function to ensure proper processes are followed. However, the fundamentally requirement to pre-warn an employee that termination may be imminent was weighted heavily in determination of this case.
The employer was ordered to make payment equivalent to nine weeks salary, equalling an amount of $9,522 gross, to the employee in compensation for wages lost between the termination of his employment and the date of the hearing.
It is important to note that the Fair Work Act 2009 outlines criteria that will be considered by Fair Work Australia in determining whether a dismissal is harsh, unjust or unreasonable. These include:
a) whether there was a valid reason for the dismissal related to the person’s capacity or conduct (including its effect on the safety and welfare of other employees);
b) whether the person was notified of that reason;
c) whether the person was given an opportunity to respond to any reason related to the capacity or conduct of the person;
d) any unreasonable refusal by the employer to allow the person to have a support person present to assist at any discussions relating to dismissal;
e) if the dismissal related to unsatisfactory performance by the person—whether the person had been warned about that unsatisfactory performance before the dismissal;
f) the degree to which the size of the employer’s enterprise would be likely to impact on the procedures followed in effecting the dismissal;
g) the degree to which the absence of dedicated human resource management specialists or expertise in the enterprise would be likely to impact on the procedures followed in effecting the dismissal; and
h) any other matters that FWA considers relevant.
If you are considering terminating or are in the process of performance managing employees we strongly recommend you seek advice from CCI’s Employee Relations Advice Centre on (08) 9365 7660 or advice@cciwa.com prior to taking any action.